Sunday 26 June 2011

The solution

The UK Government will need to support a sale and lease back deal  by undertaking a Joint venture with a consortium of SWF's which will enable funders to put up the £40 billion  Once the airport is established  then the JV vehicle could be fully privatised with a public floatation. The airport will give the UK an airport that can operate 24/7  and  allow for the generation of UK's answer to Silicon Valley with the redevelopment of heathrow into a high tech centre to rival Silicon valley.

Nordic Partnership  + 44 0207 193 3604

SWOT for new Thames Airport


Advantages

Many advantages have been claimed for an airport in the Thames estuary, particularly as a replacement for Heathrow:[5][8][11]
  • Flights would no longer arrive or depart over densely populated areas of London.
  • Noise and air pollution would be much less of a nuisance, because the new airport would be in an unpopulated area.
  • As many runways and terminals as necessary could be constructed, without destroying existing settlements, whereas Heathrow is hemmed in by residents.
  • Flights could arrive and depart at all hours.
  • A high speed rail link to London with a journey time of around 20 minutes would encourage more passengers to reach the airport using public transport. Objectors point to the possibility that a high speed rail link to Heathrow could also be built. However, such a link would require expensive tunnelling under London, and was costed in July 2008 at £4.5bn.[12]
  • A high speed rail link to the nearby High Speed 1 would make London's airport a more suitable hub for north-western continental Europe: closer, and easier to reach.
  • Under the Shivering Sands proposal, it would be possible to reach the airport from terminals in both Kent and Essex, diminishing the amount of new traffic and congestion imposed on either county.
  • Regeneration of the deprived Thames Gateway.
  • Release of 2,500 acres (10 km2) of prime land at Heathrow, close to the M4 and with excellent rail links, highly suitable for housing redevelopment.
  • Traffic in west London would be greatly eased.

Disadvantages

A number of disadvantages to an airport in the Thames estuary have been pointed out:[5][6]
  • A floodplain or artificial offshore island is a vulnerable place for major infrastructure in a world where sea levels are rising.
  • It would require major investment in local infrastructure (roads, railways, schools, hospitals) in order to service the tens of thousands of employees at a major airport.
  • There would be considerable upheaval involved in moving London's main airport to a new location, though other major cities have successfully moved their main airport, including Paris (1974), Munich (1992), Denver (1995), Oslo (1998), Hong Kong (1998),Kuala Lumpur (1998), Athens (2001), Bangkok (2006).[8]
  • There would be significant job losses at Heathrow, and knock-on impacts to the economy of west London.
  • The construction costs of the airport alone would be large, estimated at £11.5bn for Cliffe, and £3.5bn more for an offshore island scheme.
  • There would be large costs for constructing road and rail access to the airport. These were estimated at £1.8bn for Cliffe, including two rail connections to High Speed 1, a road tunnel under the Thames to Benfleet, largely to access the south east Essex labour market, and other road and rail connections.
  • Proposals rely on using capacity on High Speed 1, which may be scarce.
  • Building an artificial offshore island is time-consuming, adding 3 to 5 years to the construction time.
  • The risk of bird strike is higher for coastal sites, although less so for off-shore sites.
  • The level of demand for an airport in the Thames estuary is uncertain, and may require government intervention to force airlines to use it.
  • Building a major new airport to expand capacity may encourage more flights, and thereby increase emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
  • The presence of the wreck of the SS Richard Montgomery, which has around 1,500 tons of explosives on board. A way to remove the wreck safely, present since 1944, has not yet been found.
  • NATS are not in favour of the proposals. It would require a radical upgrade to the current flight patterns which are based on 1970s patterns and the proximity to Dutch and Belgian airspace would cause knock on effects in other countries.









































Thames estuary Steering Group

























please click here for full presentation

Feasibility Review of Thames Airport





















CLICK HERE FOR A FREE COPY OF THE REPORT 

china expressed frustration at the shortage of slots at Heathrow: "I can't land in Britain anywhere I want to. If you can fix that, I'll send more tourists."


The man who pays his way
Saturday, 25 June 2011
Cold comfort: Heathrow has links to tiny Kiruna in Sweden, home to the Ice Hotel
Cold comfort: Heathrow has links to tiny Kiruna in Sweden, home to the Ice Hotel
SPONSORED LINKS
Ads by Google

Spread Betting - Try Now
Try GFTs Award-Winning Trading
Platform. Free Practice Account.
www.GFTuk.com

Designer Watches
Official Designer Watch Stockist
Free Next Day Delivery - Full Range
www.PeterBurrowes.co.uk/Chanel

Luxury Thames Cruises
The finest river voyage and dining
experiences. Tariffs from £125
www.spiritofchartwell.com

Ace Cars - Crawley Taxi
Crawley's Leading Taxi/Private Hire
24hr Service, call 01293 888 888
www.acecarscrawley.co.uk
Christopher Rodrigues, chairman of VisitBritain, was stumped. This rare occurrence came about at an event where he found himself sitting next to the boss of China Southern Airlines – one of Asia's biggest, carrying 80 million passengers a year, and dwarfing almost all European carriers.
The subject turned to how the two might work together to entice more Chinese visitors to the UK. Mr Rodrigues reports that his companion expressed frustration at the shortage of slots at Heathrow: "I can't land in Britain anywhere I want to. If you can fix that, I'll send more tourists."
As airports across Britain, from Gatwick to Glasgow, implore new airlines to fill the yawning gaps on their departure boards, Heathrow is a different country. Passengers pay a premium to fly to and from Europe's busiest airport. Accordingly, "LHR" is the one UK gateway that Mr China Southern, and many other airline bosses, want to serve. The problem: Heathrow's take-off and landing slots are the the most precious commodities in aviation.
At present no British airport has links to China Southern's deep-south hub of Guangzhou, population 12 million. However much Gatwick or Manchester might move heaven, earth and landing fees to entice the airline to launch flights from China's third city, the only way is Heathrow.
But the airline knows that the airport is effectively shut to new arrivals, or at least to big airlines keen to run a meaningful schedule at reasonable times.
Sneaking on to the departure screens, amid all the jumbo jets bound for Asia and the Americas, are a handful of small towns whose very presence seems an aberration. Finding themselves on the world's elitest radar screen are the 180,000 residents of St John's in Canada (the same population as Preston); the 35,000 citizens of Beja in rural Portugal; and Kiruna's 20,000 shivering souls in the far north of Swedish Lapland.
Why are small jets flying obscure routes when they could be handling 500-seater planes bound for China? Because they serve profitable niche markets. Air Canada charges £775 return from Heathrow to St John's next month – about the same as the fare to fly more than twice as far, to Vancouver. Passengers to St John's will pay a fat premium to sit in a thin plane.
Beja is even more of a minority sport. Sunvil, the independent tour operator, reckons some folk will pay handsomely for direct flights to Portugal's beautiful Alentejo region. But not too many. So it dispatches only one 49-seat jet each week. By choosing the anti-social departure time of 6am on a Sunday morning, with the return hop arriving at lunchtime the same day, Sunvil has secured access to and from Heathrow from the airport's bin-ends, that small pile labelled "the 0.5 per cent of slots at odd times that no one wants".
And Kiruna? Well, the Scandinavian airline, SAS, has had a 10.35am slot for a flight from Heathrow to Stockholm since the dawn of time. It's the return leg of the (very profitable) first flight of the day from the Swedish capital to London, and is often half-empty. A sub-optimal slot, indeed.
Another enterprising tour operator, Discover the World, persuaded the airline occasionally to redirect the 10.35am departure to fly non-stop to the Arctic instead of Stockholm, giving British travellers access to the Ice Hotel and Northern Lights. On 10 days between December and March, you can slide off on a reindeer-hauled safari just four hours after take-off from Heathrow – so long as you have booked your slot on the sleigh.
Birmingham, gateway to ... Turkmenistan
For Heathrow's rivals, the airline schedules must make frustrating reading. Tomorrow, for example, 16 wide-bodied planes line up at LHR to fly you to New York's JFK airport. The rest of the UK can marshal only two departures to America's main gateway, both of them narrow-bodied jets from Manchester. But Heathrow doesn't get everything its way.
Most of the popular Mediterranean holiday spots, from Alicante to Zante, are unavailable from Heathrow. If you are dreaming of Ashkabad in Turkmenistan (left), Birmingham boasts four flights a week compared with Heathrow's two.
Heathrow doesn't offer the widest choice of destinations, either, with a mere 193 this summer. Manchester and Gatwick boast more diverse departure boards, each showing over 200 destinations.

Third Runway No Go at Heathrow

June 26th, 2011 | Travel News

By Andrew Gibson
British Airways have now given up hope of getting a third runway built at Heathrow Airport. The Chief Executive of the International Airlines Group, who are the parent company of BA, said that they would now change focus. Willie Walsh went on to say that they would be focusing on expanding places like Madrid instead.
British Airways was very keen to get Heathrow to expand but since the UK coalition government have announced that expansion plans have been halted, they have abandoned their plan. There were many campaigners who were against the expansion plans and they have been celebrating this decision which they feel is a victory for them.
Having announced in The Times Newspaper that he felt that a third runway would now never be built at Heathrow, he went on to say that because of the overcrowding in London, many airlines were already looking elsewhere and that he would now be doing the same thing. He said that London could have grown in the way that Dubai has but because of this restriction, he will now be looking for growth in areas outside of the UK.
Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, said that he felt it was a serious matter that British Airways needed to go abroad to expand. He is backing a new airport build at the Thames Estuary, which would be very big. He said that Heathrow has been close to capacity for a long time and that they were always struggling to fit in more than they could actually manage.

City Hall transport tsar confirms Thames airport proposal a "go"




thamesairport.jpg
News Desk
Kulver Ranger the "transport tsar" at City Hall has confirmed in an interview to LBC that the Thames Estuary airport was a credible proposal and is being looked at seriously by the mayor's office.  A report in the Sunday Times showed support for this proposal from the president of Emirates airlines Tim Clark who said Heathrow is now "severely compromised" and cannot compete with the European and Middle Eastern hubs that are growing aggressively at present.
Ranger speaking to Andrew Pierce of LBC made the case for a new airport in the Thames estuary given the length of time needed to obtain planning for a new extensions at Heathrow.  In comparison the Thames estuary is not such a sensitive geographical area and a new airport may be approved and built within 5-7 years which will help with the traffic coming in from the continent and the US.With the 2012 games arriving in less than four year all airports in the capital will be at full capacity adding further strain to the already heavy traffic coming into London.
City Hall is anxious that any new airport is integrated into the cross-rail projects being planned at present so that high speed rail links can be used to transport passengers from these airports into the heart of London. The Sunday Times report also highlighted the threat Dubai poses to London:
"While other airlines are retrenching, Emirates plans to take delivery of 245 new aircraft in the next decade. The billions being ploughed by Dubai into its infrastructure constitute one of the greatest threats to Heathrow’s current leadership in international air travel."
Already Virgin has been approached by City Hall to look at the proposal for the new airport who is also looking at buying Gatwickfrom BAA.

Thames estuary airport "only viable and environmentally acceptable option"

07 April, 2011 08:44 (GMT +01:00)


ArticleVideoPhotos
Nick and Bernard 070411.JPG

News Desk

Former minister for London Nick Raynsford (LAB) and former Transport Secretary Bernard Jenkin (CON) have added their names to the growing list of supporters for a new airport to be built on the Thames Estuary, with a letter in The Times today.
"
A Thames airport could provide four runways to compete directly with Frankfurt, Charles de Gaulle and Schipol".

Refuting the claims that train travel times to the proposed airport on the Thames estuary would be longer than going to Heathrow Jenkin and Raynsford said:

"The Thames Estuary proposal which would be only 8 minutes further by rail from the City of London than Heathrow, and far better placed rail connections to North Europe".

The Conservative party ran a campaign pre-election of opposing a third runway at Heathrow, something they have consistently advocated with the refusal to grant permission to BAA the owners of Heathrow permission to build a third runway at Heathrow.

Heathrow Airport is used by over 90 airlines which fly to 170 destinations worldwide with 67 million annual passengers, 11% travel to UK destinations, 43% are short-haul international travellers and 46% are long-haul. Heathrow has been ranked 99th out of 146 leading airports in the world in terms of passenger satisfaction behind airports in India and other countries in the third world.
photo credit: L-R Nick Raynsford MP, Bernard Jenkin MP 

Boris Johnson backs new report calling for Thames Estuary airport


9:49am Tuesday 18th January 2011


MAYOR of London Boris Johnson is once again looking at plans to expand London’s air base into the Thames Estuary.
A new report overseen by Transport for Londondeputy chairman Daniel Moylan and released today has Mr Johnson’s backing.
The report calls for a new hub airport to be created in south-east England so that the UK can remain a competitive air base.
Although the exact location of the airport has not been decided, the Thames Estuary may still be considered.

YOUR VOTE

Are you in favour of a new hub airport in the Thames Estuary?
Yes: 
Blue bar used for ballot results 19%
No: 
Yellow bar used for ballot results 76%
Don't know: 
Purple bar used for ballot results 1%
Don't care: 
Green bar used for ballot results 4%
Thanks for voting - this ballot is now closed
The report said that the number of destinations accessible from Heathrow is 157, compared to 224 from Paris Charles de Gaulle and 235 from Frankfurt.
The report also said that Heathrow is handling up to 75,000 more passengers than it was built for every day.
Mr Johnson said: "No other city even approaches the volume of passengers handled at London's airports but we need to start planning for a brand new airport that can help meet the ever-increasing demand for aviation and act as a hub, particularly to the rest of the UK."
London Assembly Green Party member Darren Johnson said: "There has been significant opposition to this idea from local people, politicians and from environmental campaigners.
"The mayor would better represent Londoners' interests by pushing for investment in alternatives to aviation, such as improved and more affordable rail services."
The last proposals for an airport in the area concentrated on the Hoo Peninsula, which is home to some 300,000 birds.